Today Stephen Stockwell opened the door for us to do some independent research on a topic we often overlook when it comes to our precious New Communication Technologies. I'm talking about politics and how our use of communication technologies has an affect on this. Now, this is not just referring to politicians and the like, but the politics of life and the world in general, so lets keep that in mind (although I will be talking about politicians too).
Of course, as per usual, internet enabled computers allow us to participate globally and share our political and social opinion while engaging in debate. The internet has changed the way political party's handle their campaign's with many politicians nowadays making use of youtube, facebook and twitter in order to gain the support of the new generation. I recall Kevin Rudd doing this back in the day - everyone loved him because he posted a video on youtube and he added anyone who would have him on facebook.
Most of us are what is referred to as part of 'the public sphere' meaning, we don't have a lot more influence than our single vote. However, through media and technology, including: the internet, talk back radio and opinion polls, we all get to have a say and most probably influence many final political outcomes. Regardless of how powerless we may feel, in the long run, if a person has a good opinion and can support it, people are going to notice and agree. The internet is just the resource to make such a statement.
If you look a few posts back, you'll notice the Taylor Swift versus Kanye West debate. Not a situation of great importance, but within hours of it happening the internet was riddled with opinionated video responses, such is its power. The same can be done for any political debate. So if you have a good opinion, go ahead and throw it on youtube, chances are people will listen, even if just a few thousand.
Another attribute of Stephen Stockwell's lecture was his overview of the 'Cyberpunk' genre. Technology influences our culture and times very strongly, with Cyberpunk exploring uses of powerful technologies, including computers, the internet, and ideas of cyberspace all with an underlying theme of anarchy.
There were also a number of great readings offered by the lecture including
Mark Poster's 'Cyber Democracy' and also
We’re all hackers now: Doing global democracy.
This week for our tutorial we had a number of tasks. Firstly we had to sign an epetition.
Rather than sign one of the many ridiculous petitions located at a site like
petitionspot, I opted to sign something that might have actual momentum. So I looked a little deeper and found:
whalesrevenge, it already had over one million signatures so I was more than happy to contribute. It also had a little flashgame on the homepage made in the style of 'sinksub' where instead of a submarine you take the role of a whale and shoot high pressure water at the Japanese ships above. A clever and fun game that clearly illustrates the cause and concern in question.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/497dc/497dc45a953ddb23ccf421f3de2ee3e807abc47a" alt=""
The next task was to find out what U.S. Prime Minister Barack Obama was up to today. I was quick to find a website that enjoys stalking him. While they were yet to update on his activities of the day, although, maybe they had, I'm just not taking into account time difference. The articles go as follows.
"Posted September 15 12:27:51 PM
UPDATED: The event has ended, but we'll have more on the President speech at the AFL-CIO Convention later."
"Posted September 15 5:59:12 PM
Earlier today, the President traveled to Pittsburgh, PA for the annual AFL-CIO convention. He addressed the gather union members, thanking them for their support and laying out his priorities. He spoke about the Recovery Act, his priorities for rebuilding a new, greener economy, and how health insurance reform will help all Americans achieve security and stability when it comes to their medical care. Here are some excerpts from the speech: For over half…"
If you want to stalk Barack Obama too, I recommend
www.barackobama.com.
Next I was to respond to a professional blogger at a major news site. I frequent
ninemsn news as it pops up every time I log into messenger. I scrolled through some pop culture stories and replied to this one in particular.
http://music.ninemsn.com.au/blog.aspx?blogentryid=486180&showcomments=trueNow I was to find out who my local, state and federal representatives are. This wasn't exactly easy, but after checking a number of government sites I managed to find the people in question.
www.goldcoast.qld.gov.au led me to CR John Wayne of the Gold Coast City Council, my local Helensvale representative. The others were a little easier with my State government representative for Qld being MP Peta-Kaye Croft and my federal representative for Australia being MP Stuart Robert MP. The prior two representatives were derived from these sources:
http://www.goldcoast.qld.gov.au/attachment/factsheets/contacts-federal.pdfhttp://www.goldcoast.qld.gov.au/attachment/factsheets/fs357_government_members.pdfMy next task instructed me to find out the last time my local member had spoken in parliament and then to let him know what I thought about his speech. I wasn't able to find any info on his parliament speeches, it seems his focus is dedicated to the local community. All for his current exploits can be found
here along with an email address (
division2@goldcoast.qld.gov.au) at the bottom of the document where I was able to contact him and let him know he was a benefit to our community. If I really wanted I could meet him in person "
I am at the Helensvale library to meet with residents on the first and third Wednesdays of the month from 9am to 10am. No appointment is necessary."Finally, with all that said and done, it's time to attack...
THE CLEAN FEED!!!
From the time it was first brought up there has been unanimous disapproval from nearly all Australians except for the evil Minister - Senator Stephen Conroy. My personal thoughts and feelings on censorship were already very strong. I utterly disapprove of censorship of any kind, I see censorship as denying reality and locking the bank of available knowledge. I agree things should be classified in age appropriate categories, that way, the parents and the individual gain the responsibility and the freedom to choose what they can and can't watch, view or interact with. That freedom is what we are about to lose should the evil Minister - Senator Stephen Conroy's plan to censor the world go through. I say this because the majority of all information nowadays comes from the internet. It's the greatest collaboration of human knowledge and creativity on earth and Stephen Conroy seems to be jealous. I am thoroughly against his evil plan.
The website
www.nocleanfeed.com says it all in terms of good points. I highly recommend viewing it if you wish to learn more about the Clean Feed and what it means for Australia.
The following facts come from the aforementioned site.
"The filtering will target legal as well as illegal material."
"$44m has been budgeted for the implementation of this scheme so far."
"The clean-feed for children will be opt-out, but a second filter will be mandatory for all Internet users."
"A filter will slow Internet access down by up to 80% according to a Government report."
"Only illegal material published on web sites could be targeted, completely missing other methods of distribution such as BitTorrent."
(Which just happens to be the biggest method of illegal distribution from what I gather and hear from people that use torrents.)
"Most Australians don't want the filter.Support for this overly broad policy is virtually non-existent, even from child-protection organisations. A recent survey shows that 51.5% of Australian net user strongly oppose the plan, while only 2.9% strongly support it."
"The money is better spent elsewhere. The filter will cost tens of millions of dollars to attempt. Yet the Government's own studies admit education is more effective than filtering in protecting children, and that "content risks" are less dangerous than other risks."
It's unclear whether or not this plan is specifically being implemented in order to protect children from content or whether its focused on preventing illegal downloads, however, the very act of such viewership, the responsibility falls on the user themselves, and in the case of children, the parents.
"The protection for children is minor at best, an illusion at worst. The clean-feed does nothing to protect children from real threats like cyber-bullying, online sexual predators, viruses, or the theft of personal information. It may provide a false sense of security to parents, reducing effective monitoring of their children's online activities."
As my favorite quote from nocleanfeed asks "Who decides what material is "appropriate" for Australians to see?" The world is what it is and life would be better spent trying to improve the world directly rather than trying to pretend like certain things don't exist. Plus it's a massive waste of money - trying to spend money denying us the internet! How about spending that money so that people who can barely afford food might be able to eat time to time, let alone have internet.
Jeez, this filter thing has gotten me really worked up.
Craig Out.